<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>lynnfredricks.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lynnfredricks.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lynnfredricks.com</link>
	<description>The Technology Tribe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Library of Congress, DMCA and Jailbreaking iPhones &#8211; Does it Allow Jailbreaking?</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/26/library-of-congress-dmca-and-jailbreaking-iphones-does-it-allow-jailbreaking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/26/library-of-congress-dmca-and-jailbreaking-iphones-does-it-allow-jailbreaking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Fredricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jailbreaking iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnfredricks.com/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is being widely reported on the blogosphere that the US government has &#8220;okayed&#8221; jailbreaking of iPhones and expressly made it legal. In the interest of getting to the truth, I located the three year announcement on the Library of Congress website that seems to cover these exceptions for the DMCA . It is worth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is being widely reported on the blogosphere that the US government has &#8220;okayed&#8221; jailbreaking of iPhones and expressly made it legal. In the interest of getting to the truth, I located the three year announcement <a title="Library of Congress Jailbreaking iPhone" href="http://www.loc.gov/today/pr/2010/10-169.html" target="_blank">on the Library of Congress website that seems to cover these exceptions for the DMCA</a> . It is worth reading and interpret it as you will. The sections on software do not appear to inherently allow jailbreaking except within a narrow set of conditions for use &#8211; however it could be that other reports are based on information found from another source.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lynnfredricks.com%2F2010%2F07%2F26%2Flibrary-of-congress-dmca-and-jailbreaking-iphones-does-it-allow-jailbreaking%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Library+of+Congress%2C+DMCA+and+Jailbreaking+iPhones+%26%238211%3B+Does+it+Allow+Jailbreaking%3F';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/26/library-of-congress-dmca-and-jailbreaking-iphones-does-it-allow-jailbreaking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blender 3D: Free is Never Completely Free</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/23/blender-3d-free-is-never-completely-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/23/blender-3d-free-is-never-completely-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Fredricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnfredricks.com/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to respond to a very, very short MacGems article on MacWorld covering Blender 3D and awarding it a 4.5 out of 5. I think having a free piece of software around is a good thing, because it keeps 3D vendors producing meaningful updates to their software. But Blender itself is a victim of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to respond to <a title="Blender 3D" href="http://www.macworld.com/article/152633/2010/07/blender2.html" target="_blank">a very, very short MacGems article on MacWorld covering Blender 3D</a> and awarding it a 4.5 out of 5. I think having a free piece of software around is a good thing, because it keeps 3D vendors producing meaningful updates to their software. But Blender itself is a victim of its own enthusiastic user base.  Professional 3D software is never easy to use to someone new to the field, and while Blender has improved significantly since its last major release &#8211; it is not easy to use. In addition, like many open source projects, you run into feature niggles that can be terribly difficult to resolve. For example, I tried to import a small handful of 3DS format models into Blender &#8211; ones that imported flawlessly into several commercial 3D products.  The results looked like a bad Star Trek transporter accident.</p>
<p>Free is never completely free. If a software product is missing a feature you need, or some feature is broken, the work around time you spend has an opportunity cost associated with it. If I have to just through several software packages to convert my models to work with Blender, or if I have to recreate my models in Blender, the cost of Blender just went up by the cost of my time.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lynnfredricks.com%2F2010%2F07%2F23%2Fblender-3d-free-is-never-completely-free%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Blender+3D%3A+Free+is+Never+Completely+Free';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/23/blender-3d-free-is-never-completely-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP Aries IDE for WebOS Impresses</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/22/hp-ares-ide-for-webos-impresses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/22/hp-ares-ide-for-webos-impresses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Fredricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aries IDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebOS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnfredricks.com/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found just enough time yesterday to get across town to visit OSCON, the O&#8217;Reilly run Open Source Convention which returns this year to Portland, Oregon. One of the most impressive things I saw there was the HP Aries IDE, the free, online application builder for WebOS &#8211; the reincarnation of Palm OS.At this point, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found just enough time yesterday to get across town to visit OSCON, the O&#8217;Reilly run Open Source Convention which returns this year to Portland, Oregon. One of the most impressive things I saw there was the HP Aries IDE, the free, online application builder for WebOS &#8211; the reincarnation of Palm OS.<span id="more-292"></span>At this point, Palm seems to be running a distant third or fourth to iPhone and Android &#8211; not discounting the power of Symbian, now with Nokia. It is understandable why HP is making it as easy as possible to develop apps for WebOS &#8211; and provided a beautiful application building tool for building web based applications.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lynnfredricks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ares_thumb.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-291" title="ares_thumb" src="http://www.lynnfredricks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ares_thumb.png" alt="HP Aries IDE for Web OS" width="638" height="420" /></a></p>
<p>My understanding is that Aries uses their own, open, JS library underneath called Mojo. You build your apps online, but you can still pull it all down to your own computer and modify the underlying js, graphical libraries and more. And before you ask, yes, it also uses WebKit.</p>
<p>HP also provides a full C/C++ SDK that allows you more granular access to the magic of the hardware. An HP rep informed me, for example, OpenGL is present there so if you are porting a game to WebOS, you have some options.</p>
<p>It is free and includes a built in simulator. If you dismissed Palm for dead, you will be surprised at this demonstration of life.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lynnfredricks.com%2F2010%2F07%2F22%2Fhp-ares-ide-for-webos-impresses%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'HP+Aries+IDE+for+WebOS+Impresses';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/22/hp-ares-ide-for-webos-impresses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valentina 4.7 Columnar Database, Reports and Server Released</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/20/valentina-4-7-columnar-database-reports-and-server-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/20/valentina-4-7-columnar-database-reports-and-server-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Fredricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Upgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentina 4.7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentina DB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentina Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentina Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnfredricks.com/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paradigma Software shipped Valentina 4.7, including updates to the core columnar database, Valentina Reports and server specific improvements. There were a few really annoying issues put to rest with this release, and more improvements to SQL Explain functions. For Mac OS X developers though, this also brought 64 bit versions of Valentina for Cocoa, Valentina [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Valentina 4.7 Released" href="http://www.valentina-db.com/en/company/news/1-latest-news/235-valentina-47-released" target="_blank">Paradigma Software shipped Valentina 4.7</a>, including updates to the core columnar database, Valentina Reports and server specific improvements. There were a few really annoying issues put to rest with this release, and more improvements to SQL Explain functions. For Mac OS X developers though, this also brought 64 bit versions of <a title="Valentina for Cocoa" href="http://www.valentina-db.com/en/downloads/valentina-for-objective-c" target="_blank">Valentina for Cocoa</a>, <a title="Valentina C++ for Mac OS X" href="http://www.valentina-db.com/en/downloads/valentina-for-c" target="_blank">Valentina C++ for Mac OS X</a> and <a title="Valentina PHP" href="http://www.valentina-db.com/en/downloads/valentina-for-php" target="_blank">Valentina PHP (Client and Standalone) on Mac OS X</a>. Not to be ignored, Valentina PHP Client is also available in a 64  bit version for Linux.</p>
<p>At its core, Valentina DB is a columnar database, but you can treat it much like a traditional relational database.  With its columnar roots, you&#8217;ll find your database operations, especially complex queries against databases with records numbering hundreds of thousands or more, far faster than a relational database &#8211; with some operations, it may be only twice as fast. With others, its hundreds or thousands of times faster. This is especially meaningful if you are pulling large data sets for analysis with your custom applications. Valentina DB is a long time favorite with financial service application providers.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lynnfredricks.com%2F2010%2F07%2F20%2Fvalentina-4-7-columnar-database-reports-and-server-released%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Valentina+4.7+Columnar+Database%2C+Reports+and+Server+Released';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/20/valentina-4-7-columnar-database-reports-and-server-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So You Can&#8217;t Resell Your Gray Market Imports&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/12/so-you-cant-resell-your-gray-market-imports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/12/so-you-cant-resell-your-gray-market-imports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Fredricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Sale Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gray Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnfredricks.com/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the First Sale Doctrine does not apply to goods copyrighted for sale abroad that are gray marketed back into the United States. The trick is in interpretation of origin of manufacture, IE  &#8220;lawfully made under this title&#8221; translates into &#8220;legally made and sold in the United [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that <a title="No First Sale Doctrine for Gray Market Goods" href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/07/if-you-buy-an-imported-watch-do-you-really-own-it.ars" target="_blank">the First Sale Doctrine does not apply to goods copyrighted for sale abroad</a> that are gray marketed back into the United States. The trick is in interpretation of origin of manufacture, IE  &#8220;lawfully made under this title&#8221; translates into &#8220;legally made and sold in the United States.&#8221; While it is legal to resell imported goods, the first sale doctrine only applies if they were originally made and sold in the United States.  There is no doubt in my mind that the Supreme Court will have to review it since this is a wide reaching reinterpretation of &#8220;lawfully made under this title.&#8221; <span id="more-287"></span>CostCo like other discounters will often buy using the vendor unauthorized venues referred to as the <a title="Gray Market" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_market" target="_blank">gray market</a>. The problem with gray market business, from a vendor perspective, is that the vendor often has to respond to local distribution costs, laws and other obstacles by selling products into specific markets at differing prices &#8211; then the players in those markets turn around and sell them back to discounters, such as in the case above where a UK distributor sold goods to a partner in Malta, who then sold them back into the North American market.</p>
<p>Where this runs into trouble is where some partners are given exclusive or special license, and in turn those partners have special responsibilities in those markets. Some examples in the tech market are localization, support and returns management.  Here is a very concrete example. <a title="Mirye Software" href="http://www.mirye.net" target="_blank">Mirye Software</a> is the exclusive English publisher of <a title="Shade 3D" href="http://mirye.net/shade-10-overview" target="_blank">Shade 3D, one of the oldest 3D products on the market today and the dominant 3D modeling, animation and rendering product in Japan</a>. Some responsibilities of Mirye include translating and localizing Shade into English, marketing Shade, providing technical support to English speaking Shade customers and also managing channel issues for Shade. Now if E Frontier began selling an English capable version into China, and the Chinese partners sold these abroad, Mirye could easily be saddled with a customer base to support (costs) without actually having made the original sale.</p>
<p>Some games companies have come up with various tricks to deal with these problems. For example, if you bought a game import outside of your region and go to activate your game online, it would most likely fail, because the game company can match your region with the type of activation code you have. However this has problems too. Lets say I purchase a game in English, and want my friend who is living abroad in China to be able to play it. He may have a US residence, and even US credit cards, but there could be some indicator that shows his origin outside of the US &#8211; and he doesn&#8217;t want to play the Chinese version of the game because he can&#8217;t read Chinese. It is the same logic as the also flawed regional encoding system of DVDs to DVD players.</p>
<p>I can fully understand the problem from a vendor perspective.  Also &#8211; this may also hide something more insidious when applied to the medical and pharmaceutical industries which are doing their best to stop the gray marketing of their products into the United States.  I don&#8217;t have an easy solution to this &#8211; the courts have so far applied a very blunt and damaging instrument to it.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lynnfredricks.com%2F2010%2F07%2F12%2Fso-you-cant-resell-your-gray-market-imports%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'So+You+Can%26%238217%3Bt+Resell+Your+Gray+Market+Imports%26%238230%3B';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/12/so-you-cant-resell-your-gray-market-imports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teaching Mac Programming for the K-12 Market: Not Viable with Apple Only Software</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/05/teaching-mac-programming-for-the-k-12-market-not-viable-with-apple-only-software/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/05/teaching-mac-programming-for-the-k-12-market-not-viable-with-apple-only-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 22:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Fredricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K-12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnfredricks.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently visiting my daughter&#8217;s high school and their newly remodeled media focused building, I came to the realization that Apple has completely given up on teaching programming to kids. This will come to many as a complete surprise since Apple has a reputation for being the best solution for the K-12 market.For historical reasons, Apple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently visiting my daughter&#8217;s high school and their newly remodeled media focused building, I came to the realization that Apple has completely given up on teaching programming to kids. This will come to many as a complete surprise since Apple has a reputation for being the best solution for the K-12 market.<span id="more-284"></span>For historical reasons, Apple has long been a friend to education. I cut my nerd teeth on Apple IIs and BASIC back in the 1980s, later using Apple IIGS for grading students papers when I got my teaching certificate. I have fond memories of parent-teacher conferences where I sat down with parents with a 20 page visual report showing their child&#8217;s progress (or poor grades from not doing their homework).</p>
<p>The Mac was well loved even then in education and delightfully pushed the old Apple IIs out of schools. Fast forward to 2010, a parent myself, with a teen even going to my own alma mater.  After a conference, I stepped over to the beautiful new computer room and noticed it was full of <a title="Apple eMac: No Macs in Education" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMac" target="_blank">Apple eMacs</a>. These were G4 based (non-Intel) iMacs that were specifically for the education market &#8211; serviceable machines that especially had price going for them.  Now and then I use an old G4 based Mac Mini for web surfing (and testing out PPC based software) and it remains a very viable computer.</p>
<p>Now here is the problem, actually two problems &#8211; Apple xCode 3.2.X and higher (released in March 2010)  require an Intel based Mac running Mac OS X 10.6.  Just based on hardware specs, the K-12 market is in trouble, however consider the operating system requirements in addition to this. Many shipped with OS 9.2 and an early version of Mac OS X &#8211; 10.1.4. The eMac can run Mac OS X 10.5, which makes it possible to use xCode 3.1.x. However several iterations of xCode also require Mac OS X 10.5. This means there have been at least one or more paid for OS system updates  which may not be present on K-12 Macs. Apple wants its developers running the most recent versions of Mac OS X, and if you check backwards compatibility, usually only two versions back of the OS than the then current OS. For example, you are going to have a lot of trouble supporting an OS version earlier than 10.4 if you use the present kit.</p>
<p>So the options are bleak if you want to stick with Apple only tools. If you are using one of these old Macs (like so many K-12 schools are), they can, at best, run only older versions of xCode. And that in turn means your programming course cannot include development for the iPhone too.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lynnfredricks.com%2F2010%2F07%2F05%2Fteaching-mac-programming-for-the-k-12-market-not-viable-with-apple-only-software%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Teaching+Mac+Programming+for+the+K-12+Market%3A+Not+Viable+with+Apple+Only+Software';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/07/05/teaching-mac-programming-for-the-k-12-market-not-viable-with-apple-only-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell Knowingly Sold Defective Computers</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/06/29/dell-knowingly-sold-defective-computers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/06/29/dell-knowingly-sold-defective-computers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Fredricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Off Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnfredricks.com/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times shines a light on Dell and its practice of knowingly selling defective computers between 2003-2005, according to unsealed court documents. It makes you wonder how the public interest was served by concealing this information revealed in court. I had a Dell laptop that had epic failures during this time &#8211; two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/technology/29dell.html?hp" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/technology/29dell.html?hp" target="_blank">The New York Times shines a light on Dell</a> and its practice of knowingly selling defective computers between 2003-2005, according to unsealed court documents. It makes you wonder how the public interest was served by concealing this information revealed in court. I had a Dell laptop that had epic failures during this time &#8211; two hard drive replacements, graphics card and screen replacement &#8211; and still had performance issues that would occur inexplicably and made using several types of software impossible. Despite that Dell sent repair people twice to repair the laptop, they refused to do a complete replacement of an obviously defective system.</p>
<p>Dell pioneered the direct sales model when the norm was to purchase single units through retail or catalogs. The upside was that they could pass the savings on to customers because they could cut out the channel. People tend to forget that the channel does provide some value other than just speedy delivery and the option to spend more on in-store advertising &#8211; retailers and distributors hate returns more than customers do. Dell claims that its direct model gives it the ability to react sooner to quality issues, but it also removes channel Darwinism from the picture.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lynnfredricks.com%2F2010%2F06%2F29%2Fdell-knowingly-sold-defective-computers%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Dell+Knowingly+Sold+Defective+Computers';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/06/29/dell-knowingly-sold-defective-computers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Public Domain Works Be Put Back Under Private Copyright?</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/06/23/can-public-domain-works-be-put-back-under-private-copyright/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/06/23/can-public-domain-works-be-put-back-under-private-copyright/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Fredricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Off Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Domain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnfredricks.com/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some at TechDirt, a site I usually have no basis for agreement has a very interesting article on the Golan case and an appeals court that seems to have ruled that congress can, as they see fit, put public domain works back under private copyright if there is some governmental interest in doing so.

  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some at TechDirt, a site I usually have no basis for agreement has a very interesting article on the Golan case and an appeals court that seems to have ruled that congress can, as they see fit, <a title="Can Public Workd Be Put Back under Private Copyright" href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100621/2320049908.shtml" target="_blank">put public domain works back under private copyright if there is some governmental interest in doing so</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lynnfredricks.com%2F2010%2F06%2F23%2Fcan-public-domain-works-be-put-back-under-private-copyright%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Can+Public+Domain+Works+Be+Put+Back+Under+Private+Copyright%3F';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/06/23/can-public-domain-works-be-put-back-under-private-copyright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Apple.com Overtly Change Experience for Non-Safari Users?</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/06/15/does-apple-com-overtly-change-experience-for-non-safari-users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/06/15/does-apple-com-overtly-change-experience-for-non-safari-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Fredricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple vs Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML 5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnfredricks.com/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite that I have some very contrary views to Apple on handling their SDK licensing, I still like many Apple products.  For example, I think the Mac Mini is about the best value desktop computer available.  It packs a huge amount of value into a nice looking and, more importantly, very small case. I noticed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite that I have some very contrary views to Apple on handling their SDK licensing, I still like many Apple products.  For example, I think the Mac Mini is about the best value desktop computer available.  It packs a huge amount of value into a nice looking and, more importantly, very small case. I noticed something very odd this morning though when following a link from <a title="MacIntouch" href="http://www.macintouch.com" target="_blank">Macintouch</a> to Apple.com to check out the specs of the <a title="New Mac Mini" href="http://www.apple.com/macmini/specs.html" target="_blank">just announced update to the Mac Mini</a> &#8211; accessing the Apple.com website from my Windows based, non Safari browser was extremely slow. Could this be intentional?<span id="more-277"></span>At first, I thought it was simply a result of it being a newly announced Apple product and the site being hit by a lot of traffic &#8211; that&#8217;s while using Firefox 3.6.3 on Windows.  So then, I opened up Google Chrome 5.0.375.70. It was slow loading at first, but on a second try it loaded up the Mac Mini specs speedily.  In both cases, all indications seem to be a slow down on retrieving graphics, but it is clear that Chrome was clearly caching graphics on the first attempt. I don&#8217;t have ready access to our old Mac Mini &#8211; I went into another room and opened up Safari on the old G4 based Mac Mini there (my candidate for replacement &#8211; but still an excellent computer). Loading seemed almost instantaneous.</p>
<p>What makes me suspicious anyway about the Apple site were the alleged HTML 5 examples posted that not only required you view them with Safari, but that at least some required Safari + Mac OS X Snow Leopard. That is a terrible demonstration of standards based web browsing &#8211; to require a specific web browser and operating system.  I can only guess it is Apple&#8217;s way of getting more people using Safari.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lynnfredricks.com%2F2010%2F06%2F15%2Fdoes-apple-com-overtly-change-experience-for-non-safari-users%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Does+Apple.com+Overtly+Change+Experience+for+Non-Safari+Users%3F';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/06/15/does-apple-com-overtly-change-experience-for-non-safari-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Realtime Raytracing in Javascript</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/06/08/realtime-raytracing-in-javascript/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/06/08/realtime-raytracing-in-javascript/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Fredricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazing Javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raytracing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnfredricks.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have strong feelings towards Javascript. It is an efficient and terrible way to deliver Trojans through unsecure browsers but it also can be used for amazing things, including this realtime raytracing example in Javascript.

  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lynnfredricks.com%2F2010%2F06%2F08%2Frealtime-raytracing-in-javascript%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Realtime+Raytracing+in+Javascript';
  addthis_pub    = '';

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have strong feelings towards Javascript. It is an efficient and terrible way to deliver Trojans through unsecure browsers but it also can be used for amazing things, including this <a title="Realtime Raytracing in Javascript" href="http://29a.ch/2010/6/2/realtime-raytracing-in-javascript" target="_blank">realtime raytracing example in Javascript</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lynnfredricks.com%2F2010%2F06%2F08%2Frealtime-raytracing-in-javascript%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Realtime+Raytracing+in+Javascript';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lynnfredricks.com/2010/06/08/realtime-raytracing-in-javascript/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
